In the judgment of this writer, many descendants of
FREDERICK CROOM, who died about 1852 in
New Hanover County, have believed incorrectly that he was the last son
born to
MAJOR CROOM, I, the second son of Daniel Croom of Virginia, and his
second wife, Susannah. For some reason, those furnishing information
to Doris Croom Outlaw for her book on the Croom Family, first
published in mimeograph form about 1955, referred to this son as JAMES
FREDERICK CROOM. My studies show that his
correct name is FREDERICK J. CROOM. Military records of the War of
1812, numerous deeds, census records and court records refer to him as
FREDERICK. He did have a son whom he named James Frederick, who in turn
also named a son James Frederick. A New Hanover County 1826 deed
refers to "James, son of Frederick." On this
and other pages at this web site, I have set forth recently
discovered facts and the applied thinking of Richard Booth, a family
researcher, and this writer, in determining the correct ancestry of
this Frederick Croom.. Several years ago while I was studying
surnames other than Croom, Dick Booth demonstrated to me how effective
land records can be in proving truths and disproving family lore
pertaining to ancestors many generations in the past. "Follow the
land," he said. Upon arriving in North Carolina from Goochland County,
VA, the three sons of Daniel CROOM and their respective progeny left
"geographical footprints" that help us follow their respective lines
of descendants. Recent studies have strengthened my conviction of many
years standing that much information
in the public domain since the 1950s pertaining to the parents of FREDERICK CROOM is
incorrect.
In the early 1950s Doris Croom Outlaw of Kinston compiled family
sheets of many of the Croom families of eastern North Carolina. With
the help of many correspondents relying on old family Bibles, extant
records, and a lot of hand-me-down family lore, Doris compiled her
mimeographed family sheets in a loose leaf book, entitled, The Croom
Family. She first self-published it in 1955 and it proved to be a
popular and well-received offering at the Croom Family Reunion held
each year at Sandy Bottom, just a few miles to the southwest of
Kinston. Over the next 15 years, she made numerous revisions, as new
and corrected information was brought to her attention. The loose-leaf
book facilitated the addition of the new and/or revised sheets. Still,
many factual errors remain in The Croom Family Book. This writer had
an opportunity to visit with Doris shortly before she died. At that
time, Doris acknowledged, and it is so mentioned in her book, that
much information pertaining to Abel CROOM and his progeny was
uncertain and far from being complete.
By 1741 ABEL CROOM had emigrated from
Goochland County, VA, and in December of that year purchased land in
Craven County on the south side of the Neuse River along Whitley
Creek, about 8 miles southwest of present day Kinston. This area later
would become Johnston County, later Dobbs County and still later
Lenoir County.
By 1744, Abel's younger brother, MAJOR CROOM,
having reached 21 years of age the year before, purchased land in
Craven County on Falling Creek, on the north side of the Neuse River,
almost due north of his brother. Later this area would be in Johnston,
then Dobbs and finally in Lenoir
County.
In 1747 records reveal that
Charles HOLMES, the step-father of JESSE CROOM,
purchased 400 acres on Falling Creek, not far from the initial
purchase of Major.
Very likely, Jesse, the half-brother of Abel and Major, Jesse's mother
and other family members immigrated to North Carolina at that time.
Jesse would have been 14 years of age. In 1757, records reveal that
Jesse had come of age when he sold the land back in Goochland County,
VA, that he inherited from his father. In October of that year, Jesse
purchased land north of the Neuse River in an area of Johnston County
that later would be in Wayne County.
Note that ABEL CROOM had settled on the SOUTH side of the Neuse
River. Records reveal that the proximity of his lands was such that
his petition was granted in 1744 to operate a ferry on the Neuse River
near Whitley Creek. MAJOR CROOM began
building his plantation and starting his family a few miles up Falling
Creek on the NORTH side of the Neuse River. Finally, JESSE CROOM, the
younger half-brother, settled on the NORTH side of the Neuse River,
not far from present day Goldsboro, Wayne County. From these three
distinct geographic locations would issue most of the CROOM families
that can be found today in many of the Southern, Midwestern and
Southwestern states. Other pages at this web site detail many of the
descendants of Jesse, for example, who migrated to Tennessee,
Arkansas, Texas and other southwestern states; or the several
descendants of Major who were pioneers in settling Florida and
Alabama.
Records reveal that in 1744 Major Croom, I, purchased land on the
north side of the Neuse River in what is now Lenoir County and lived
there for the next forty-seven years.
He was a man of some standing and wealth in Dobbs County. At one time
his
land holdings exceeded 12,000 acres. Tax and census records indicate that
documented
sons of Major CROOM owned sizable estates, each at a relatively young age, an
indication that Major had given each a good "head start." If James Frederick were
his youngest son, as some have maintained, it seems incongruous that the young Frederick should have moved to
New Hanover County and settled on a relatively modest farm of 150 acres. He
certainly was not as prosperous as a young man as were Major's sons back in
Lenoir County.
Nothing to my knowledge has surfaced to suggest why Frederick CROOM
would have left relatively prosperous brothers in Lenoir County to
settle in an area of Old New Hanover County that later became Pender
County.
FREDERICK CROOM IS A DESCENDANT OF
ABEL CROOM
The major "highways" of the 1700s were the rivers,
their tributaries and the many creeks, large and small. Travel of even
ten miles was no small matter. So family tended to settle and spread
to nearby acreage. As families grew, the need to travel to new areas
was necessary. Most of the members of succeeding generations had to
move. Sometimes it would be to another part of the county or to the
next county. By the early 1800s, some family members --especially
those of Jesse, son of Daniel, and Major, son of Daniel, were taking advantage of
lands being offered in other states or territories, like the western
counties of North Carolina, which later became Tennessee, or the
southern territories that became Georgia, Florida, Alabama and
Louisiana. Most of Abel's children and grandchildren remained in
Duplin County until the late 1700s. Jesse, son of Abel, and some of
his children were in New Hanover County by 1790.
Diligent studies of extant land and other records by
Dick Booth and this writer have resulted in identifying relatively clear
migratory paths of the
respective descendants of the three Croom brothers. These studies have
challenged some of the long-held beliefs concerning the issue of the
three brothers. The DESCENDANTS of ABEL CROOM
and the DESCENDANTS of MAJOR CROOM
web pages at this site set forth details pertinent to some of the issue
of these two brothers that
until now have been mostly conjecture. These assigned issue
are based largely on studies of land records and relationships to
other early settlers. In some instances, some names are shown as
"speculative but very likely."
NO ONE. I REPEAT: NO ONE HAS PRODUCED A
SINGLE RECORD OR A SINGLE FACT TO SUPPORT THE NOTION THAT MAJOR CROOM,
SON OF DANIEL, HAD A SON NAMED FREDERICK OR JAMES FREDERICK CROOM.
MY ANALYSIS OF STRONG CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUGGESTS
FREDERICK CROOM WAS A DESCENDANT OF ABEL CROOM. THE PATH FROM ABEL TO
FREDERICK, HOWEVER REMAINS CLOUDY BUT RECENT STUDIES SUGGEST THAT
FREDERICK J. CROOM WAS A SON OF JOHN CROOM, WHO WAS A SON OF JESSE,
WHO WAS A SON OF ABEL CROOM.
Who was the father of each of these men? Who
appears to hold the key to unlocking family connections in Old
New Hanover County for:
-
ISAAC CROOM, apparently an
adult in 1822
-
TIMOTHY CROOM, b c1800, d bet
1850 & 1860
The mysterious Isaac Croom
granted 140 ac to Timothy Croom in 1822 on the ns of Burgaw
Creek. In 1820 Frederick Croom had acquired 200 ac in this
same area from John Croom, whom I believe to be the father of
Frederick. Q: Were Isaac
and Timothy natural sons of John Croom,
b 1764?
Q: Inasmuch as ISAAC has not been found in any
other deed, tax list, court record or census in New Hanover
County, is it possible that ISAAC, having reached majority,
sold land
to his brother Timothy, land that was given to him by
his father? Read more details at:
DESCENDANTS OF ABLE CROOM page
at this web site.
|
|
Why Frederick Croom is
NOT
a son of Major Croom, I, and his 2nd wife, Susannah
- Records show that Frederick was born about 1788. By that
year, other records show that Susannah, wife of Major Croom, I,
was 54 or more years of age, past normal childbearing.
-
Records indicate that Major Croom had three sons by Susannah,
his second wife: Hardee (c1764), Richard (c1765) and
William (1772). In an 1804 court deposition, Susannah testified
that she had a daughter by her former marriage born in 1755. Her
son John Enloe of that former marriage was born about 1750. It
seems unlikely that she would be the natural mother of Frederick
in 1788.
- Some contend that the male less than 16 years of age in the
household of Major Croom, I, in the 1790 Federal Census is
Frederick, his youngest son. This is wild speculation. By 1790
Susannah had grandchildren, possibly even great-grandchildren, from her first marriage. These and
other family members make much more sense as likely candidates
than assuming it is Frederick. This speculation is not much
different than another entry in Doris Croom Outlaw's The Croom
Family. She stated that the John Croom listed in Stokes
County of the same 1790 Federal Census was the grandson of Abel
Croom. Evidence I have discovered offers compelling reasons why
this is not true. See John
Croom, the German immigrant at this web site.
- In his 1805 Will, Richard Croom, son of Major Croom, I, named his brothers: Hardee
and William. No mention was made of a Frederick, even though
some contend that he was a full blood brother of Richard,
Hardee and William. Frederick would have been about 17 years of age
in 1805.
- Frederick Croom served in Nixon's Company in the New Hanover
County Militia during the War of 1812. Strange that a son of the
prominent Major Croom of Dobbs County would serve in the New
Hanover Co. militia.
- Records reveal that Major Croom provided well for his
documented sons, all of whom were in Dobbs or contiguous
counties. William, his youngest and only 19, is listed in 1790
as living alone and with 23 slaves. Frederick, not documented as a son of Major, settled
in New Hanover County on a very modest farm of 100 acres deeded
to him by his father-in-law.
- Hardee Croom died intestate in 1807. In 1810,
after the death of
his mother Susannah, a petition was filed in
court for the partitioning of the lands and real estate of the
deceased Hardee Croom. The petition named many of the
whole-blood and half-blood kin of Hardee; however no mention was
made of a Frederick Croom. Records of the court's later decision
presumably were lost in Lenoir Court House fires. Extant records,
however, reveal several deeds relating to the sale and purchase
of various lands following the partitioning of Hardee's lands. No
mention is made of a Frederick Croom. even though by that time
Frederick Croom was at least 23 years of age.
|
Why Has Family Lore Persisted That Frederick Was a Son of Major
Croom, I?
My database contains no fewer than sixteen males
named Major Croom. In the late 1700s, four of those lived
concurrently in Dobbs and contiguous counties. Each of the three
sons of Daniel Croom claimed at least one of those four named
Major. It is no wonder that descendants many generations later
would often confuse one Major for another. Even today, many people
cannot correctly name their great-grandparents, much less their
second or third great-grandparents.
A few decades ago the NSDAR effected more
stringent requirements for membership. Many applications submitted
prior to that time and subsequently approved reveal the lack of
substantive proof of a line of descent from a proven Revolutionary
War soldier or patriot. Frequently, this writer has seen new
applications rejected that attempted to "ride in" on the coattails
of an earlier approved application. To my knowledge, no
application has been approved in recent years that cites Frederick
Croom as a son of Major Croom, I. |
WHY
FREDERICK CROOM VERY LIKELY WAS a
SON of JOHN, WHO WAS a SON of JESSE WHO WAS a SON of
ABEL CROOM.
Recent studies strongly
suggest that the father of Frederick Croom was John Croom
(1764-c1825).
John, son of Jesse Croom (1737/40-1827), likely was born in Dobbs
County and in his youth lived with his father in Duplin and Onslow
counties before coming to New Hanover County just before 1790. In
1812, John bought 512 acres along Burgaw Creek, the first of
several subsequent purchases in that area.
The following facts can be found in extant records:
1- Jesse Croom possibly married Anne Grady. Her father's will
named a daughter, Ann Croom. She had a brother
named FREDERICK.
2- Frederick Croom acquired his first land, 100ac on Cypress
Creek, NHC, from his father-in-law, James Malpass in 1815.
3- Frederick Croom acquired the remaining 200ac on Cypress
Creek in 1818 of a parcel his father-in-law had purchased in 1812.
4- Frederick Croom acquired his next 200 ac on ss of Burgaw Creek,
NHC, in 1820 from John Croom, who had acquired it in 1818.
5- 1800 NHC Census listing for John Croom makes a
reasonable fit
for the following males:
2 under 10: Frederick b c1791; Timothy b 1800.
1 26 thru 44: John Croom, b 1764
6- Plats along Burgaw Creek show contiguous land parcels owned by
John Croom, Frederick Croom, and Timothy Croom.
7- John Croom's sister, Elizabeth, named a son Timothy shortly
after Timothy Croom was born in 1800.
Although Doris Croom Outlaw
claimed that Frederick was the youngest son of Major, the 2nd son
of Daniel Croom of Virginia, she did cast some doubt on that and
ventured that he could have been a son of Abel. I believe that
Frederick was a grandson of Abel Croom.
|
|